Research

Studying the gap between evidence and access.

My research interests developed around pain, serious illness, and the systems that determine whether effective care reaches patients.

Recurring questionWhy can a treatment be medically useful and still remain difficult for patients to receive?

Selected Work

Three lenses on pain and access

Palliative Radiotherapy · Published

A Practice Model for Palliative Radiotherapy

Research on barriers that can limit hospice patients’ access to palliative radiation, including reimbursement incentives and professional boundaries. The project pushed me to think about why evidence alone is not enough to change care.

First author
Published in Cureus
View DOI →
Opioid Policy · Published

Understanding the Opioid Crisis

A policy-focused investigation into the opioid crisis and the incentives, prescribing practices, and public-health consequences surrounding pain management.

Sole-author research
Published in Highlights in Business, Economics and Management
Pain Prediction · Ongoing

Predicting ICU Pain One Hour Ahead

A data-science project using gradient-boosted trees to predict near-term pain and detect high-pain events in intensive-care settings, exploring whether earlier signals can support more responsive care.

Research in progress
Paper pending

What Connects Them

Different methods, one underlying concern

Clinical usefulness

I am interested in what evidence says can help a patient—and how confidently we know it.

Institutional incentives

I look at reimbursement, regulation, and professional structures that can shape whether useful care is actually delivered.

Patient experience

Across projects, the endpoint I care about is not the model or policy itself, but what changes for the person receiving care.

Reflection

Research changed the question I was asking.

I began by asking whether a treatment worked. I became more interested in the harder follow-up: if it works, what still prevents patients from receiving it?